Is Psychology Today a credible source? In this case, the Psychology Today article is a very rare example which is cited and referenced, yet the referenced article does not actually prove their claim, making their article questionable How many other questionable articles are there in Psychology Today?
Name change of CogSci - what about Psychology? Psychology often distinguishes between major subfields such as cognitive psychology, social psychology, individual differences, applied psychology,and so on There is also a distinction between cognition, affect, and behaviour The point is that psychology does a better job of reflecting the inclusive nature of the site
Actively engaging psychology departments on Facebook? If psychology departments would like our pages, then thousands of people (which are our target audience) will get to know of our existence Therefore, I was thinking to send a message to the psychology departments, asking them to like us What are your thoughts about actively engaging the psychology departments of different universities?
What are reliable sources? - Psychology Neuroscience Meta Stack Exchange One concern is that if we accept Wikipedia for non-professional questions, then what about other resources: TED talks, random blogs, magazines, Psychology Today? Read more: Is Wikipedia a reliable source? on Medical Sciences SE Are there instances where citing Wikipedia is allowed? on Academia SE Reliability of Wikipedia on Wikipedia